Stanza five elaborates on Arthur's desire to hear a marvelous tale before he joins in the feast. He appears to stand - "He stightles stif in stalle;" (104) he is not seated at the head of the feasting table, next to Guinevere as he should be. Instead, he is ready to listen to a tale "Of alderes, of armes, of other aventurus;" (95) or joust with a challenging knight - with the risk of losing his life. The wish of the king for deadly sport seems inappropriate in the Christmas setting of the poem, possibly even irreverent in light of the religious aspects of the holiday. Though the king's demands are childish or "child-gered" (86), he sets the scene for the appearance of the Green Knight, which effectively fulfills the request as Arthur "that aventure byholdes" (250) in stanza twelve.
The impression of Arthur delivered by the poet is not a dauntless, seasoned leader, but an impatient, belligerent boy. We already know of his strange pre-dining antics, and we are also told that, "His lif liked hym lyght, he lovied the lasse | Auther too longe lye or too longe sitte," (87-88). He is too restless to stay lying or sitting for long, and thus he stands at the the end of the stanza. His blood is described as young, his brain wild - how can this portrayal be correct if he is to have Gawain in his company, his nephew of age enough to behead a giant? The image of Arthur is now skewed; he is not a young man, yet his mannerisms are dismissed as a product of youthfulness. Stanza twelve claims Arthur to be bold before the Green Knight, "for rad was he never" (251). Perhaps he is not afraid, but his answer is not in the form one might expect from a king..., "Wyghe, welcum i-wys" (252) sounds more like a surprised greeting than an identification of himself as the master of the court. Arthur calls his court a "ostel" (253), which we shall presume to mean the modern english word, hostel. A hostel is hardly a place for revelry and riches; it is a transitory place for youths, and usually quite barren excepting the essentials. Arthur's chosen word here is ultimately unsuitable considering the magnificence of the feast and decorum about him. He certainly doesn't come across as an authoritative superior in his own domain, and so the Green Knight continues in his speech, dominating all within the scene. Arthur's impatience is underscored by his answer to the Green Knight's words of peace in stanza twelve; he responds with slight animosity, declaring that his court would not decline to fight an unarmed challenger (though the mysterious knight has just explained his holly branch in detail). It appears Arthur has not even listened to what the Green Knight has said, and his reply is hardly noble - a courteous knight would never assault an unarmed victim. With this notion in mind, the proposal of the game is a further insult to the court, for anyone who takes on the challenge will attempt to slay an unarmed man. Perhaps this is the reason the court remains silent in response to the challenge, and the silence merely prompts the Green Knight to begin a slew of insults upon Arthur's court in stanza fourteen.
Arthur's reaction to the slanderous words of the Green Knight is comparable to a fish taking bait; Arthur's image encompasses virtue, courtesy, and knightly honor, yet he can be tempted into foolish games with a few taunting words. Perhaps a step back from the verse itself is in order here, for a parallel situation is being illustrated silently by the author of the poem. The entire kingdom is doomed by its own pride, this Christmas game being a metaphor for its downfall. The famous king who upholds the chivalric ideals is taunted by the Green Knight, representative of the evils of overconfidence, gives in to embarassment and its resulting anger. The story goes on, nevertheless, as Gawain steps in to take the fall instead.
Arthur's uncharacteristic rage in stanza fifteen demonstrates his failure to live up to the "kydde cortaysye" (263) spoken of in stanza twelve. He has attempted thus far to remain dignified in his reception of the brutish Green Knight, but his pride has been so insulted that he must take action to defend the court's reputation. In previous stanzas, Arthur's movements have been described only minimally, whereas now we are exposed to the detail of motion more consistent with the Green Knight; Arthur leaps toward the Knight, grabs the axe and grips it harshly, sternly thinking to strike with it. In defying the challenger, Arthur seems to have stooped to the giant's level of speech, swearing "by heven" (323), "by Godes halve" (326), throwing out insults, "thou foly has frayst," (324) and boasts of "I schal baythen thy bone" (327). He then leaps forward and takes up the axe, the Green Knight "feersly" lighting upon foot (not alighting graciously, as Arthur asked). Larry Benson describes the effect perfectly:
Arthur's harsh reaction to the Green Knight is demonstrated by more attention to his physical motions and his angered speech. The Green Knight at the moment of Arthur's rage becomes calm, subdued, and voiceless...as if the two personalities had crossed. The concept of the Green Knight being the complementary part of Gawain, presented in class, seems to be paralleled in this stanza, but in a different manner than Gawain's pairing. Arthur becomes Gawain's complement instead of the Green Knight at this moment, a situation which Gawain rejects by intercepting the game.
Each of the three stanzas plucked from the story of Gawain and the Green Knight contain elements that seem unfit for an Arthurian tale. Stanza five gives readers an impressive of an unsatisfied young boy, who makes ridiculous rules for himself regarding dining, and who has an over-abundance of physical energy. Arthur's request to hear of a marvel before eating, however, foreshadows the magnitude of the event about to occur shortly, the arrival of the Green Knight. Because of Arthur's dislike to "Auther too longe lye or too longe sitte," (88) he avoids being directly assaulted by the Green Knight's challenge before the court has a chance to take him in. As the Green Knight delivers his speech, "And here is kydde cortaysye, as I haf herd carp," (263) the poor reaction of the courtiers confirms that the court's fame is based more on words than deeds. The rude manners of the challenger become reflected in Arthur's reception of him, and tension rises over the validity of the court's reputation. With no one to speak for him, Arthur is forced to take up the action himself in stanza fifteen, now quite enraged by the insults of the Green Knight. None of these stanzas could be omitted from the poem without great loss - stanza twelve describes the theme that will reoccur through the entire work: can Arthur's court fulfill its reputation of bravery and courtesy? In general, Arthur's character seems to be shown here as more human than legendary, his emotions in reactions to certain situations being what many would consider normal. To interpret the strange representation of Arthur as comic, we must also see the ending parallel of Arthur as comic as well, thus lifting the seriousness of Gawain's failure, though not altogether forgetting it.